|
WHY DON'T YOU GIVE ME A CALL, MR PRESIDENT? |
|
|
|
Written by Sarah Palin
|
|
Wednesday, 09 June 2010 |
50 days in, and we've just
learned another shocking revelation concerning the Obama administration's
response to the Gulf oil spill.
In an interview aired yesterday
(6/08), President Obama admitted that he hasn't met with or spoken directly to
BP's CEO Tony Hayward. His reasoning:
"Because my experience is, when you talk to a guy like a BP CEO, he's gonna say
all the right things to me. I'm not interested in words. I'm interested in
actions."
First, to the "informed and enlightened" mainstream media: in all the
discussions you've had with the White House about the spill: did it not occur to you before yesterday to ask
how the CEO-to-CEO level discussions were progressing to remedy this tragedy?
You never cease to amaze. (Kind
of reminds us of the months on end when you never bothered to ask if the
President was meeting
with General McChrystal to talk about our strategy in Afghanistan.)
Second, to fellow baffled Americans: this revelation is further proof that it
bodes well to have some
sort of executive experience before occupying the Oval Office -- as if the
painfully slow response to the oil spill, confusion of duties, finger-pointing,
lack of preparedness, and inability to grant local government simple requests
weren't proof enough.
The current administration may
be unaware that it's the President's duty, meeting on a CEO-to-CEO level with Hayward,
to verify what BP reports.
In an interview a few weeks ago
with Greta Van Susteren, I noted that based on my experience working with oil
execs as an oil regulator and then as a Governor, you must verify what
the oil companies claim - because their perception of circumstances and
situations dealing with public resources and public trust is not necessarily
shared by those who own America's public resources and trust.
I was about run out of town in Alaska
for what critics decried at the time as my "playing hardball with Big Oil," and
those same adversaries (both shortsighted Repubs and Dems) continue to this day
to try to discredit my administration's efforts in holding Big Oil accountable
to operate ethically and responsibly.
Mr. President: with all due respect, you have to get involved, sir. The
priorities and timeline of an oil company are not the same as the public's. You
cannot outsource the cleanup and the responsibility and the trust to BP and
expect that the legitimate interests of Americans adversely affected by this
spill will somehow be met.
White House: have you read Washington Post this week? Not to pile it on BP, but there's an
extensive report chronicling the company's troubling history:
"BP has had more high-profile accidents than any other
company in recent years. And now, with the disaster in the gulf, independent
experts say the pervasiveness of the company's problems, in multiple locales
and different types of facilities, is striking.
‘They are a recurring environmental criminal and they do not follow U.S.
health safety and environmental policy,' said Jeanne Pascal, a former EPA
lawyer who led its BP investigations."
And yet just 10 days prior to the explosion, the Obama administration's
regulators gave
the oil rig a pass, and last year the Obama administration granted
BP a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) exemption for its drilling
operation.
These decisions and the resulting spill have shaken the public's confidence in
the ability to safely drill. Unless government appropriately regulates oil
developments and holds oil executives accountable, the public will not trust
them to drill, baby, drill. And we must!
Or we will be even more beholden to, and controlled by,
dangerous foreign regimes that supply much of our energy. This has been a
constant refrain from me.
As Governor of Alaska, I did everything in my power to hold
oil companies accountable in order to prove to the federal government and to
the nation that Alaska could be trusted to further develop energy rich land
like ANWR and NPR-A.
I hired conscientious Democrats and Republicans (because
this sure shouldn't be a partisan issue) to provide me with the best advice on
how we could deal with what was a corrupt system of some lawmakers and
administrators who were hesitant to play hardball with some in the oil field
business.
(Remember the Alaska
lawmakers, public decision-makers, and business executives who ended up going
to jail as a result of the FBI's investigations of oily corruption.)
As the aforementioned article notes, BP's operation in Alaska
would hurt our state and waste public resources if allowed to continue. That's
why my administration created the Petroleum Systems Integrity Office (PSIO)
when we saw proof of improper maintenance of oil infrastructure in our state.
We had to verify.
And that's why we instituted new oversight and held BP and
other oil companies financially accountable for poor maintenance practices. We
knew we could partner with them to develop resources without pussyfooting
around with them. As a CEO, it was my job to look out for the interests of
Alaskans with the same intensity and action as the oil company CEOs looked out
for the interests of their shareholders.
I learned firsthand the way these companies operate when I served as chair of
the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). I ended up resigning in
protest because my bosses (the Governor and his chief of staff at the time)
wouldn't support efforts to clean up the corruption involving improper
conflicts of interest with energy companies that the state was supposed to be
watching.
I wrote about this valuable learning experience in my book,
"Going Rogue". I felt guilty taking home a big paycheck while being reduced to
sitting on my thumbs - essentially rendered ineffective as a supervisor of a
regulatory agency in charge of nearly 20% of the U.S. domestic supply of energy.
My experience - though, granted, I got the message loud and clear during the 2008
campaign that my executive experience managing the fastest growing community in
the state, and then running the largest state in the union, was nothing
compared to the experiences of a community organizer - showed me how government
officials and oil execs could scratch each others' backs to the detriment of
the public, and it made me ill.
I ran for Governor to fight such practices. So, as a former
chief executive, I humbly offer this advice to the President: you must verify.
That means you must meet with Hayward.
Demand answers.
In the interview today, the President said:
"I don't sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar.
We talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I
know whose ass to kick."
Please, sir, for the sake of the Gulf residents, reach out to experts who have
experience holding oil companies accountable.
I suggested a few weeks ago that you start with Alaska's
Department of Natural Resources, led by Commissioner Tom Irwin. Having worked
with Tom and his DNR and AGIA team led by Marty Rutherford, I can vouch for
their integrity and expertise in dealing with Big Oil and overseeing its
developments.
We've all lived and worked through the Exxon-Valdez
spill. They can help you. Give them a call. Or, what the heck, give me a call.
And, finally, Mr. President, please do not punish the American public with any
new energy tax in response to this tragedy. Just because BP and federal
regulators screwed up that doesn't mean the rest of us should get punished with
higher taxes at the pump and attached to everything petroleum products touch.
Sarah Palin
|
Discuss this item on the forums. (60 posts)
|
|
