FROM SICK CARE TO SELF-CARE: WHY LIFE EXTENSION WAS WRITTEN

In today’s America, declining health has quietly become a growth industry.
The worse chronic conditions become, the larger the markets that form around managing symptoms rather than restoring health. Modern healthcare excels at intervention, crisis response, and pharmaceutical dependence—but far less at prevention, nutrition, and long-term vitality.
This didn’t happen overnight, and it didn’t happen by accident.
Over the last century, medicine in the United States shifted toward a drug-centric, allopathic model—one that prioritizes patentable treatments and standardized protocols over individualized care, nutrition, and lifestyle.
As this system expanded, non-drug approaches were gradually marginalized, and the public was conditioned to believe that health comes primarily from prescriptions rather than daily choices.
Most people are never taught the history of how this system developed, how medical education was shaped, or why nutrition was pushed to the sidelines. As a result, many assume the current model is the only one possible—and that declining health is inevitable with age.
Where Durk Pearson & Sandy Shaw Enter the Story
Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw wrote Life Extension because they fundamentally rejected that assumption.





WASHINGTON, D.C. — With President Trump and Republicans campaigning hard to shore up election integrity in the U.S., congressional Democrats agreed to negotiate on the issue on the condition that death certificates be added to the list of acceptable forms of voter ID.
There’s 
