ASHES, ASHES, AND WE ALL FALL DOWN
American law enforcement is working through a historic question of purpose and direction. The public and the national thinkers have a broad spectrum of things they believe about what we should be doing, and how we should be doing it.
There is an equally large debate mirroring this within law enforcement. Are we nurturers? Warriors? Secretaries? Mental health specialists? Role models? Ideas abound. Meanwhile, the calls for service keep coming and all politicians want us to help them get elected.
Jack asked me to comment on this article from the American Thinker titled, “If it all goes wrong, with whom will the police side?” The police aren’t supposed to have a “side”; our mandate is to enforce the law. But, the American understanding of law and order in some circles is devolving into a strongman concept of the legitimacy and exercise of power-- if you have it, use it; and the implications be damned.
Democratic considerations are an obstacle to getting what we want; not a responsibility to uphold. This is not American thinking. It is Soviet, Mongol, Mexican, or fascist thinking, and it is getting the nod from way too many people who ought to know better in governments across the nation at all levels.
The question in this article is: “Should our government decide “our democracy” is in imminent danger and it’s necessary to suppress dangerous insurrectionists like Catholics and soccer moms, would America’s federal, state and local police play along?”












