A.C. Rosenthal
July 16, 2026
[A Response to Craig Considine]
There is a particular move in Western academic writing that I have come to recognize on sight.
It arrives whenever a pattern of violence associated with one civilization becomes inconvenient for a certain kind of argument.
The move goes like this: locate a comparable act of violence from a different civilization, describe it with maximum rhetorical force, and present the comparison as analysis. You are not explaining anything. You are manufacturing a tie. And a tie, in this context, is not a draw. It is an acquittal.
When two defendants are declared equally guilty, the one you came to prosecute walks out the side door while everyone is still looking at the other one.
Dr. Craig Considine makes this move in a 2015 piece titled “Why Celebrating Columbus Day is Like Celebrating ISIS Day.”
The core argument is that Christopher Columbus and the Spanish Catholic Monarchy carried out a holy war against indigenous peoples that is morally equivalent to what ISIS was doing in the Levant in 2015, and that critics who point to Islamic violence as a distinctive problem have either forgotten or chosen to ignore the West’s own record of atrocity.
Considine is a sociologist at Rice University with twenty years of published work on Christian-Muslim relations, so this is not a casual social media take. It is a considered academic argument by a credentialed scholar, and it deserves a considered response.
Let me say first that the history Considine describes is not fabricated.
Read more...