The Oasis for
Rational Conservatives

Member Login

You are not currently logged in.








» Register
» Lost your Password?
Albania Wonderland
Explore Portugal
Atlantic Paradises
Wheeler Expeditions
Member Discussions
Article Archives
L i k e U s ! ! !
TTP Merchandise

DEMOCRATS BECOME MARXIST COMMUNISTS RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

BLM/Antifa Marxists demand woman raise her fist for them, she refuses

Washington DC restaurant, August 25, 2020

In a Forum comment on my No Fear of the Evil Eye book installments, Mellie kindly said:

“I’m so glad to see you finally doing this, Dr. Jack. And I think this is the perfect time for it – the effects are so readily seen. Your ‘for examples’ can come straight from this morning’s paper!”

In subsequent chapters, you’ll be gaining an understanding of how the basic foundational principles of Marx, Lenin, and Mao explain what the Radical Left is doing right now in their takeover of the Democrat Party.

I’m going to jump the gun here, to make one thing clear as it won’t wait.  Let me tell you a story.

Little more than nine months before the fall of the Berlin Wall, in late January of 1989, I had an impromptu lunch with Gennadi Gerasimov, personal spokesman for Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev and the official spokesman of the Soviet Foreign Ministry, in Acapulco, Mexico.

We were both speaking at a conference of the Young Presidents Organization, an international group of businessmen. Gerasimov was there at Gorbachev’s bequest to persuade them to invest in the Soviet Union. My speech was entitled, “The Coming Collapse of the Soviet Union,” and in it I said that investing in the U.S.S.R. was an excellent way to lose your money because before very long the Soviet Union would cease to exist.

My prediction at the time seemed so farfetched that those YPO members who already had put money into the Soviet economy got so upset with me that they suggested I had been smoking some Acapulco Gold.

During a luncheon break, my wife Rebel, never the shy one, spotted Gerasimov, swept into the seat next to him, patted the empty chair to her right for me to sit down, gave him a dazzling smile, and asked, “May we join you?”

Gerasimov was gracious, I was dubious. He was a colonel in the KGB, and had to be familiar with my reputation as the founder of the Reagan Doctrine, since the Soviet press had denounced me as an “ideological gangster.” Nonetheless, he was one of Gorbachev’s closest associates, so I said what the hell to myself, let’s go for it.

Naturally, he soon was talking about “peace.” While others at the table promptly recognized the signal to turn their brains into mush and began nodding their heads sagely over how important “peace” was, I decided to cut the silliness short.

“The trouble, Gennadi, is that ‘peace’ for Soviets and Americans mean very different things. ”

“What do you mean, Jack? Peace is peace.”

“No, the Russian word mir does not correspond to the English word peace. Your government insists that whenever it uses the word mir in its pronouncements and propaganda, it be translated in English as peace. But ‘mir’ is not ‘peace’.”

“What is it, then?”

Order. For Americans, peace means the absence of violence. For you Soviet Communists, mir means the absence of disobedience. That’s very different.

For us, peace means freedom: people being left alone without violence so they can conduct their lives and work towards their goals peacefully. For you guys, ‘peace’ means obedience: the ‘vanguard of the proletariat’ ‑‑ your buddies on the Politburo ‑‑ giving the orders, and everybody else obeys. When the ‘masses’ are all good little boys and girls and obey their masters, you have order, and then you have ‘peace’: mir.”1.

Silence reigned at the table, while Gerasimov stared at me without a trace of expression. By now, I was revved, so I plowed ahead before he could reply.

“Tell you what, let’s talk about real peace. The people I work with in Washington, we’re not interested in peace as an armed truce. America has a real peace with its former enemies against whom we’ve fought real wars, like Japan and Germany, or England and Spain for that matter, all of whom are now our friends and allies. We can have the same kind of real peace with your country as well.”

“And what do we have to do to get this ‘real peace’ of yours, Jack?” he asked, eyeing me warily.

There was no other choice now but to go all the way. I tried to respond matter‑of‑factly and quietly. I wanted my words to be flat, without any argumentative sarcasm.

“The way to real peace, Gennadi, is for your government to stop being a colonial power. Just as England and France and the other Western powers gave up their empires decades ago, now you must give up yours ‑‑ and I don’t just mean freedom for Cuba or Angola in the Third World, or even Poland or Hungary in Eastern Europe. I mean freedom for Ukraine, for Georgia, for Lithuania ‑‑ even for Russia itself.”

With a faint smile of condescension, he smoothly replied, “You mean an invitation to disintegration.”

I did my best to be just as smooth and conversational. “The disintegration is inevitable. The real question, Gennadi…” I looked straight at him… “is, will it be peaceful?”

The unruffled veneer of the professional diplomat vanished for a brief second as his head snapped back in shock. No one had ever said anything like that to him ever before. He made no reply and we looked at each other silently. Rebel wisely decided to break the spell. “So, Gennadi…” she broke in, and began engaging him in small talk.

I tell this story (with the footnote below) now because the Democrat Party of Biden, Harris, Hillary and Pelosi is in solidarity with BLM/Antifa fascist criminals in demanding submission to them as the only way “peace” – order, the absence of disobedience – will be achieved in America.

As a protestor succinctly explained this at a BLM rally in Chicago last Saturday (8/22):

“We have demands and they need to be met … we’re not asking you anything. We’re telling you what’s about to happen with your permission or not… You can listen to us or you can get ran over.”

This is precisely the Democrat threat explained by Adam Mill in TTP yesterday:  Vote Democrat or We’ll Burn Your Country Down.

“The looters, vandals, arsonists, thugs, and, in some cases, murderers, are not responsible for their actions because they’re reacting to Trump’s ‘rhetoric,’ his provocations,’ and his tweets.

 

This excuse—Trump made me mad so I can be violent—should be dismissed as ridiculous. It reminds us of what an abusive husband says to justify beating his wife.

 

If only Trump would apologize and learn to adopt leftist policies, then there could be peace. But he insists upon charting an offensive and non-conforming political agenda. What choice do the rioters have?”

What choice do the Democrats have but to cheat-by-mail to win?  What choice does The PIAPS have but to say “Biden should not concede under any circumstances.”

Look at that short video clip above of the mob of berserk fascisti screaming at an innocent bystander woman that she submit to them.  What are they screaming at her?  “No justice, no peace.”  Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist-Maoist Fascist Communism to the core.

And that’s our future, America’s future, if we do not rise up, sweep all this criminal insanity away, and provide the Trump electoral victory we must have for our country’s survival.


 

  1. In Marxist ideology, mir can only be achieved only through the world‑wide liquidation of exploitative capitalism. The Soviet Military Encyclopedia states: “Peace [mir] is impossible without socialism… A truly lasting peace is impossible and cannot be achieved without a proletarian revolution.” (Moscow: USSR Ministry of Defense, 1976‑1980, vol. 5, 1978, p. 316.). In Lenin’s words: “As long as capitalism and socialism exist, we cannot live in peace.  In the end, one or the other will triumph ‑‑ a funeral dirge will be sung either over the Soviet republic or over world capitalism.” V. I. Lenin, “Speech to Moscow Party Nuclei Secretaries, n November 26, 1920. Selected Works (New York: International Publishers, 1943), vol. 8, p. 297.